…it comes with the territory of being a leader...you always have some good, some bad, some low maintenance, some high maintenance, some achievers, some dead beats, those that are worthy of your trust and those that are not. In the context of a normalized distribution saying in a sample of 10, you probably have two very strong performers, two very weak performers, and 6 somewhere in the middle. You as a leader have responsibility to work with the weakest, even when it almost is thankless. When necessary for the good of the majority, find a way to work around the trouble maker while letting the trouble maker keep his self esteem...being effective is more important than appearing right.
So for example if a Patrol phone chain were to be patched, one might consider having an unreliable boy at the end of the list, or consider letting all the boys not called complain to the unreliable boy, that is if you as leader think it is a conflict worth picking. Use of foul language is not acceptable. Deal with foul language or any bad behavior through leading by example. It is all about choices we make which should always be aligned with the Boy Scout Oath and Law. We can't always choose who we lead, but rather need to lead who we are dealt which is our responsibility as leaders.
Rank Advancement equals leadership equals responsibility equals Trust. You might be touching the lives of people more than you know. Stay on your game because it shows.